Report

After a child fatality in 2001, Maine’s child welfare and protective services came under scrutiny for their aggressive, their bureaucratic, legalistic approach, and their seeming indifference to the consequences of removing children from their familiar surroundings. The fact is, Maine’s approach to child protection was not all that different from practices in plenty of other jurisdictions.

On the other end, Maine ran into an issue in the mid 1990s when the system was overly cautious about removing a child – who ultimately died – from a dangerous situation.

The result: a loss in balance that led to stark, black and white decision making. Needing to resolve the issues in their system, Maine enlisted the help of the Annie E. Casey Foundation to implement new practices that created better decision making processes, reduced reliance on congregate care, and refocusing practices on permanence. 

January 1, 2009

In This Report, You’ll Learn

  1. 1

    The problems that many state child welfare systems face.

  2. 2

    How these problems reinforce ineffective practices.

  3. 3

    The problems with congregate care.

  4. 4

    The importance of data to assess issues within a system.

  1. 5

    How the Casey Foundation helped Maine to implement new strategies and practices.

  2. 6

    The results of these new strategies.

Key Takeaway

In Maine, in 2008: fewer than 2,000 children were in foster care, down from 3,200 in 2001.

The number of children in residential care dropped 77% since 2003. 28% more children were placed with relatives than in 2003. Today, Maine has one of the lowest percentages of children in institutional care of any state. Further, it now does routine and regular reviews of each case to ensure children’s needs are met.

Findings & Stats

Statements & Quotations